American Apparel is clothing company that strives to be more
than manufacturers of cloth. The company is known for poignant ads that evoke
messages about sexuality, age, and gender. In the ad above, the message is not
instantly recognizable, granted the model is not wearing much, but that is true
of most ads today, so it is not controversial here. What is controversial is
that this model is not 7 feet tall, and 95 pounds. There is nothing wrong with
being tall and skinny, same as there is nothing wrong with being small and
curvy. However there is something wrong with media, corporations, the
entertainment industry, the fashion industry, and anyone else who makes
“beautiful” something that is not “universal”. I do not believe in standards of
beauty, nor will I say that everything is beautiful. My issue is when one thing
becomes the only thing. American Apparel put a woman in their ad that does not
match the idealized version of what industries deem beautiful. The company put
her in clothing, the industry would say is not fit for someone of her body
type, empowering the viewer to wear what they please. The ad is effective
because you look twice at it. You begin to look at the models body type, her
features, because it is different. The ad screams confidence.
The use
of proximity in the ad is interesting. The description of what the model is
wearing and where it can be found is close to the actual website name and etc.,
however they are not as close as you would expect. You understand that they are
related, but the spacing contributes more to the aesthetic and style. Obviously
the retail locations are closer together, organized and spaced nicely.
Interestingly
enough there does seem to be a line going through the middle of the ad. The words “Micro Mesh” are left aligned, but
the tail of the word does stop in the middle. The tail of “Micro Mesh” seems to
be centered with the beginning of the models body, and the retail locations
mentioned at the bottom of the ad. The invisible line, is not obvious but it is
present, a good use of alignment.
The end
of the ad is where repetition is most present. The headings and subheadings font
match, along with the same spacing in between all of them. The repetition
however is not overwhelming, it creates unison within the ad.
The ad
presents stark contrast automatically with the white background, everything
against it stands out. The large graphic becomes the focal point contrasting
with small text under it, and only one piece of larger text to deter they eye.
What is
interesting about the ad is that it contains two main colors, black and white.
The pure white background, the contrasting black font color, even the graphic
contains large amounts of black, white and grey. The minimalist use of color,
makes the models skin tone stand out, creating beautiful contrast.
The use
of type size is not subtle, your eye is drawn to the large text “Micro Mesh”
right after looking at the large graphic. At the same time the smaller text peaks
your interest, both because of its placement and the fact that it is so small
compared to the rest of the text. The type relationship is concordant, it is
the same type family with variety only in size, and weight. This concordant
relationship gives off a calm and formal yet still desirable feeling to the ad.
The font is sans serif, so the letters have the same thickness which gives off
a modern feel because it is straight to the point, there is no variation.
Overall
I believe the ad reaches its goal. It is modern, straightforward and eye-catching.
The graphic speaks for itself, the image is controversial but not for the
reasons you would think it is. The contrasts are simplistic yet powerful.

No comments:
Post a Comment